Re: [PATCH] Add branch.*.localmerge and documentation update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Santi Béjar" <sbejar@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 12/8/06, Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Clarify the meaning of branch.*.merge option and add a similar
>> branch.*.localmerge option, which can be used to specify a local
>> tracking branch to be merged by default.
>>
>> Previously, if branch.*.merge was specified but did not match any
>> ref, the message "No changes." was not really helpful regarding
>> the misconfiguration. This now gives a warning.
>>
>> The value of branch.*.merge can be a list to get an octopus
>> merge. I chose the same way for branch.*.localmerge, and if
>> you specify both options, the octopus merge will have even
>> more parents ;-)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@xxxxxx>
>
> Ack for the documentation part. But the localmerge part is almost
> equivalent to my patch to allow the branch.<name>.remote equal to ".".

I am not so sure about the "localmerge" stuff anymore.

What convenience would it buy us (including but not limited to
new people), and if there is any, would that outweigh the
potential confusion factor to have two different configuration
variables that do exactly the same thing whose sole difference
is which side of the fetched branch namespace it uses to specify
the merge source?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]