On 12/7/06, Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 07 December 2006 20:06, you wrote: > Once you place something like "branch.*.merge" in configuration > file (either $GIT_DIR/config, or a $GIT_DIR/remotes/* file), you > are talking about other repositories you regularly interact > with, so it might be probably Ok to require the user to use a > tracking branch if he wants the convenience of "branch.*.merge", > and make its value name the local tracking branch instead of the > remote branch. > > But that means I would never be able to benefit from the > convenience of "branch.*.merge"; Hmm... that's true; actually, I did not thought about people which do not want to have any tracking branches (again!). So [remote "repo"] url = ... fetch = branch1 fetch = branch2 [branch "mybranch1"] remote = repo merge = branch1 actually looks fine, and is the only possible way. But still, this does not work.
It works for me.
You have to specify merge = refs/heads/branch1
It does not. The merge line must match exactly the remote part of the refspec.
That's confusing (perhaps I can come up with a patch to allow "branch1" alone). So probably the best way is to write some more detailed explanation into the docu ...
Perhaps that the branch.<name>.remote and branch.<name>.merge have the equivalent meaning as the parameters of git-pull?
Josef - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html