Re: [PATCH] Add branch.*.localmerge and documentation update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 08 December 2006 22:38, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Santi Béjar" <sbejar@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On 12/8/06, Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >> Clarify the meaning of branch.*.merge option and add a similar
> >> branch.*.localmerge option, which can be used to specify a local
> >> tracking branch to be merged by default.
> 
> I am not so sure about the "localmerge" stuff anymore.
> 
> What convenience would it buy us (including but not limited to
> new people), and if there is any, would that outweigh the
> potential confusion factor to have two different configuration
> variables that do exactly the same thing whose sole difference
> is which side of the fetched branch namespace it uses to specify
> the merge source?

I just came up with a concrete patch.
I am not saying that this is the only true solution.

Actually, Jakubs one with allowing arbitrary refspecs is nice.
The only problem is that it is not consistent which refspec
shortcuts otherwise, or?

However, you should take the documentation part and the warning
when there is no match .

Josef
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]