Re: [PATCH 16/18] revert: Remove sequencer state when no commits are pending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi again,

Jonathan Nieder writes:
> If "tight coupling" means "builtin/commit.c calls a function declared
> in sequencer.h", then yes, I think it should be fine.

My bad. I'll first have to figure out a way to expose the todo parsing
functions (and dependent functions) without touching much else.
This'll be a huge non-trivial patch, and my post midterm work has to
include this anyway.  So I think it's better to leave it as-it-is for
now, and work on this coupling after this series is merged.

-- Ram
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]