Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes:

>> For this particular one, there is no need for version 2.
>
> I don't think you understand.

That is true.  I was not thinking about optimizing the
lightweight tag case -- we would want to be able to tell that
they are not tag objects and skip peel_ref altogether, and in
order to do that we do need a way to tell us that we can trust
the absense of peeled representation in the packed-refs file.

It is my day job day so I do not expect I can continue til later
today, though...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]