Re: [WISH] Store also tag dereferences in packed-refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sun, 19 Nov 2006, Marco Costalba wrote:
> 
> Tested also with show-ref only, not useful to me, but just as a comparison.
> 
> - git tree 1420ms
> - linux tree 1021ms
> 
> Better, but still slower then what I would expected.

MUCH slower than expected.

Can you do

	strace -o tracefile -Ttt git show-ref

and send out the tracefile?

What I _suspect_ is going on is that when you packed your refs, you either 
didn't prune them (which means that packing didn't actually help you), or 
if you did prune them, since we don't seem to remove the refs 
_directories_ when packing, you still have an old and big directory for 
.git/refs/tags, and just reading that (empty, but non-shrunken) directory 
takes time.

The -Ttt thing should show quite clearly what takes time.

(This, btw, is one _huge_ reason why the old shell script things with 
piping sucked. Doing things like performance analysis is so much easier 
with a builtin thing and really shows what's going on).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]