Re: [PATCH] Do not ignore hidden refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 09:05:12PM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 	use heads/private/ for your own stuff.  And have
> 	configuration that says "heads/private/" are private
> 	branches that are not subject to default
> 	pushing/pulling.
> 
> The real instruction from the project would say what the syntax
> for telling that to git but I think you got the idea...

Yes, I fully agree that being able to have this configurable is cool,
but I'm still interested in providing a sensible out-of-the-box default
configuration for Cogito to use. But if we can agree that heads/private/
and tags/private/ are good BCP candidates, that's great. (The only
possible problem is a lot of typing incurred. Perhaps the default refs
search order should become configurable first.)

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is:
"Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed."
		-- Kurt Vonnegut, Sirens from Titan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]