Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:27:09AM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I think, however, if we (collectively as all the Porcelain
>> writers although I am not really one of them) are to support it,
>> they should not make distinction to the core, and it should be
>> handled with the agreed-upon convention.
>
> I guess I agree.
>
>> ... I do not think it is a great
>> enough convention to be promoted as the official BCP, but it has
>> been good enough for me, ...
>
> That's way too arbitrary for my taste, I think I needn't explain why.
Because _I_ explained why already ;-).
> What about leading underscore?
I would rather prefer to do refs/{heads,private}/ and allow
checkout to treat either of them as branches. We are talking
about allowing checkout to go to a non-branch by storing a raw
commit object name in HEAD instead of leaving it as a symref, so
we know we are going to touch that area already.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html