On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:27:09AM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think, however, if we (collectively as all the Porcelain > writers although I am not really one of them) are to support it, > they should not make distinction to the core, and it should be > handled with the agreed-upon convention. I guess I agree. > Personally I established a convention to treat heads/??/* as > "private namespace" while using heads/* as public refs for my > own work (I do that for git.git as people know, and I do that > for my day job project as well). I do not think it is a great > enough convention to be promoted as the official BCP, but it has > been good enough for me, especially commands like "show-branch" > and "tag -l" understands the shell-style filegrobs (e.g > "show-branch master heads/??/*" would show what's yet to be > polished and merged). That's way too arbitrary for my taste, I think I needn't explain why. :-) What about leading underscore? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is: "Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed." -- Kurt Vonnegut, Sirens from Titan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html