Re: [PATCH 0/5] Using index-pack in place of verify-pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I'm not at all interested in this topic, but in the time it took the two
> of you to write your emails, I did this:
>
>   $ cd linux-2.6
>
>   $ time git verify-pack \
>       .git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.idx
>   real    2m37.338s
>   user    2m35.874s
>   sys     0m1.348s
>
>   $ time git index-pack --verify \
>       .git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.pack
>   real    1m37.208s
>   user    1m36.106s
>   sys     0m1.048s
>
>
> OK, with the CPU time it probably took longer than your emails. But I
> ate some ice cream while it computed. :)

I guess my box is showing its age.  It is 2m34s vs 3m25s for the kernel
repository packed with depth=50 (the default).

A pack created with insanely deep depth of course shows larger difference
(2m31s vs 4m38s for the same repository repacked with depth=8192).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]