Re: [PATCH 0/5] Using index-pack in place of verify-pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   $ cd linux-2.6
> 
>   $ time git verify-pack \
>       .git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.idx
>   real    2m37.338s
>   user    2m35.874s
>   sys     0m1.348s
> 
>   $ time git index-pack --verify \
>       .git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.pack
>   real    1m37.208s
>   user    1m36.106s
>   sys     0m1.048s

Not the improvement I had hoped. Your verify-pack ran much more
quickly than the fsck I was seeing that led me to suggest this to
Junio a few weeks ago. But saving a minute is still pretty good.

That index-pack run is basically what we get during clone, so
I don't really expect to improve on that. (However I have been
contemplating that the locality within the pack isn't optimal and
we can do better placement.)

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]