On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 05:46:19PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 17:16, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not yet; the code has just become in good enough shape to be built and
> > measured by anybody interested --- didn't I say WIP somewhere?
>
> Yes, but I figured that we'd want to see if it's worth pursuing at
> all, e.g., whether we should try and get this in decent shape or not?
I'm not at all interested in this topic, but in the time it took the two
of you to write your emails, I did this:
$ cd linux-2.6
$ time git verify-pack \
.git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.idx
real 2m37.338s
user 2m35.874s
sys 0m1.348s
$ time git index-pack --verify \
.git/objects/pack/pack-36c50f6082df404c26a699f2702946e0cce6208f.pack
real 1m37.208s
user 1m36.106s
sys 0m1.048s
OK, with the CPU time it probably took longer than your emails. But I
ate some ice cream while it computed. :)
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html