Re: [PATCH 14/21] Convert ce_path_match() to use struct pathspec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>> I wonder if it makes more sense to change the type of revs->prune_data
>>>> from an array of pointers to strings to a pointer to struct pathspec.
>>>> Is there a downside?
>>>
>>> Converting a pointer to another pointer means mis typecasting can
>>> happen and the compiler won't help catching them.
>>
>> You can rename the field at the same time, and the compiler will catch
>> anything you forgot to touch, no?
>>
> Yes. I didn't think of that :(

And it would have an added benefit that it would catch new callsites
somebody else added while being unaware of your conversion--the merge
result will not compile.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]