Re: Getting new branches from remote repo.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2006-11-13 12:44:57 -0500, Shawn Pearce wrote:

> Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > There really should be a flag to make git fetch do this job. And
> > if we use separate remotes, the flag should probably default to
> > "on".
>
> And also to automatically stop fetching any branch which is no
> longer listed on the remote system, rather than reporting a "Fetch
> failure".

Yes.

> I probably would keep the local ref (they are cheap) just in case
> the user was counting on that branch and then the remote system
> pulled the rug out from under them. :-)

Sounds like good default behavior. But I smell the potential for
another command flag here. :-)

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]