On 2006-11-12 20:49:33 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Alexander Litvinov" <litvinov2004@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > I have a trouble I don't know how to solve. When I am cloning
> > remote repo I automatically get all it's branches stored at my
> > repo (they are listed at .git/remotes/origin). When someone adds
> > new branch(es) to remote repo git pull (git fetch) does not
> > automatically add them to my repo. I have a tool to list all
> > remote branches (git ls-remote --heads origin) but I can't find
> > how to add interesting (or all) branches to by repo.
>
> After finding out $that_new_branch's name, add either
>
> Pull: refs/heads/$that_new_branch:refs/heads/$that_new_branch
>
> or if you are in "separate remote" school, then perhaps
>
> Pull: refs/heads/$that_new_branch:refs/remotes/origin/$that_new_branch
>
> to .git/remotes/origin and running git fetch would give you what you
> want, I think.
There really should be a flag to make git fetch do this job. And if we
use separate remotes, the flag should probably default to "on".
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.treskal.com/kalle
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html