"Alexander Litvinov" <litvinov2004@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > I have a trouble I don't know how to solve. When I am cloning remote > repo I automatically get all it's branches stored at my repo (they are > listed at .git/remotes/origin). When someone adds new branch(es) to > remote repo git pull (git fetch) does not automatically add them to my > repo. I have a tool to list all remote branches (git ls-remote --heads > origin) but I can't find how to add interesting (or all) branches to > by repo. After finding out $that_new_branch's name, add either Pull: refs/heads/$that_new_branch:refs/heads/$that_new_branch or if you are in "separate remote" school, then perhaps Pull: refs/heads/$that_new_branch:refs/remotes/origin/$that_new_branch to .git/remotes/origin and running git fetch would give you what you want, I think. > By the way, how can I clone remote repo created by cloning another > repo using git clone --use-separate-remotes ? Even git ls-remote > --heads origin does not show all branches taken from that another > repo. Well, the point of "separate remote" is not to pollute local heads/ namespace with refs that merely track remote repository, so if you say "ls-remote --heads" you would not see them. They are not "heads" in that repository. You would still see them if you say "ls-remote" without --heads. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html