Am 11/9/2010 13:38, schrieb Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason: > I understood your previous comments to mean that the invocation time > of git-* on one hand and cat(1) on the other hand had to do with how > many DLL's the former needed. I was only guessing; I can't explain the timing difference. > Since git-sh-i18n--envsubst needs the same DLL's (i.e. the libc) as > cat(1) and *nothing else* it should be as fast as cat(1) and not as > slow as git-*(1) once I fix that unfortunate Makefile bug, right? Wrong. Please accept it as a fact (and I'll forgive your ignorance ;) I would like to spend the time explaining the reasons only if you want to compile git on Windows yourself. -- Hannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html