Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/5] gettext: fix bug in git-sh-i18n's eval_gettext() by using envsubst(1)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:47, Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 11/9/2010 10:35, schrieb Ãvar ArnfjÃrà Bjarmason:
>> Why is that a "*must*"?
> ...
>> But maybe you have reason to think otherwise? I haven't noticed any
>> noticable slowdowns from doing it this way, but maybe I've been
>> looking at the wrong thing.
>
> You didn't do your timings in Windows, did you? Every fork() that you can
> avoid is a win.

What's the result of timing it on Windows?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]