Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from). > > How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that > be appropriate? Not much better, IMNSHO. Where do people get the idea that line-noises are more descriptive than "remote:"? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html