On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > El 11/06/2010, a las 16:34, PJ Hyett escribió: > >> Hi, >> >>> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> If its really a problem, maybe "remote: " prefix should turn into >>>> something shorter and language agnostic, like "<< ". But thus far >>>> we hadn't had to worry about it, since we didn't have translation >>>> support in Git... (though yes, I see that is changing now). >>>> >> >> I'm also in favor of making the default '>>' instead of 'remote:' if >> nothing isn't an option. > > Funny, as '>>' is basically meaningless. At least 'remote:' has semantic value (ie. it indicates _where_ something is coming from). > How about '> ', which often means "quote" (e.g in e-mails)? Would that be appropriate? -- Erik "kusma" Faye-Lund -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html