On 10/22/06, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And that work-flow is definitely not "distributed" it's much closer to > "disconnected centralized". Side note: the only reason I think that distinction is worth making at all is when comparing git to bzr, and even then this is a fairly subtle distinction, and probably not a huge deal in practice. I obviously think git is a nicer distributed design, but in the end, if you compare to something like CVS or SVN that isn't even disconnected, the difference between git and bzr in this sense is basically zero. So I sound like I care, but at the same time, I realize very well that when coming from a totally centralized world, the details we're arguing are _so_ not important.
I have to agree. Personally I think both git, bzr and mercurial are all VERY nice systems. If they weren't all started about the same time, I doubt we would have all three. I am happy to use either, but I have a small preference with bzr because it suites me. I'm saying this, just as a user, nothing else. /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@xxxxxxxxx SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sip:17476714687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html