Erik Bågfors wrote: >> So I sound like I care, but at the same time, I realize very well that >> when coming from a totally centralized world, the details we're arguing >> are _so_ not important. > > I have to agree. Personally I think both git, bzr and mercurial are > all VERY nice systems. If they weren't all started about the same > time, I doubt we would have all three. If I understand correctly bzr came to life much earlier than Monotone, Mercurial and Git but it was in beta stages very long. Bazaar-NG "repositories" to group bunch of "branches" seems inspoted by hg or git. Git (and probably Mercurial) was inspired both by BitKeeper and Monotone. Monotone started to be reasonable fast around time when Git and Mercurial came to be. P.S. I'd like very much to see "history of SCM", with links denoting borrowing of ideas, similar to the "history of UNIX" graphs... -- Jakub Narebski Poland - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html