On 10/21/06, Sean <seanlkml@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:13:28 +0200 Jan Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx> wrote: > Bzr is meant to be used in both ways, depending on user's choice. > Therefore it comes with that infrastructure and you can choose whether > you want to use it or not. From what we've read on this thread, bzr appears to be biased towards working with a central repo. That is the model that supports the use of revnos etc that the bzr folks are so fond of. However Git is perfectly capable of being used in any number of models, including centralized. Git just doesn't make the mistake of training new users into using features that are only stable in a limited number of those models.
This is just plain wrong. bzr is a fully decentralized VCS. I've read this thread for quite some time now and I really cannot understand why people come to this conclusion. However, if you do want to work centralized, bzr has commands that fits that workflow really good. /Erik -- google talk/jabber. zindar@xxxxxxxxx SIP-phones: sip:erik_bagfors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx sip:17476714687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html