On Wednesday, February 3, 2010 at 17:04:12 (+0100) Markus Elfring writes: >> If your patch is not too intrusive, and especially if you can demonstrate >> that it is a problem on a real-world system, then I think your patch would >> be considered for inclusion upstream. >> >I have got the feeling that my corresponding update suggestion (in >source code form) would become intrusive to some degree. If I do not get >an indication that issues from word-tearing in signal handlers is a >mentionable problem here, I assume that your acceptance is low for >potential fixes from every software developer (including me). Do the words "insufferable !@#$!%%$" mean anything to you? I mean, seriously, you are WELCOME TO SUBMIT A PATCH FOR THIS. Do it! Go ahead, write it! We would love to see it. Fix things, make things better! Don't continue to whine and waste people's time. ALL PATCHES ARE INTRUSIVE. JUST SUBMIT A PATCH! Bill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html