> > The general feeling on this list is that patches are listened to, no > matter how foul they are, and you will get a (hopefully) polite > rejection if it is considered useless because it addresses a problem > that doesn't exist. > I hope that a healthy balance will be found between correct software design, development and quick "hacking". There might also be more efforts if too many patches will be rejected just because the suggested and planned changes were not discussed before. Would you like to get an acknowledgement for signal handler problems from people in other discussion groups like "comp.programming.threads"? Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html