> > If your patch is not too intrusive, and especially if you can demonstrate > that it is a problem on a real-world system, then I think your patch would > be considered for inclusion upstream. > I have got the feeling that my corresponding update suggestion (in source code form) would become intrusive to some degree. If I do not get an indication that issues from word-tearing in signal handlers is a mentionable problem here, I assume that your acceptance is low for potential fixes from every software developer (including me). Regards, Markus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html