apodtele wrote: > Hi! > > On 10/12/06, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, A Large Angry SCM wrote: >> > Martin Waitz wrote: >> > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 03:20:09PM -0700, A Large Angry SCM wrote: >> > > > > + if (it) >> > > > > + return it * width / (it + width) + 1; >> > > > > + else >> > > > > + return 0; >> > > > No conditional needed: >> > > > >> > > > return it * width / (it + width - 1) >> > > >> > > But then it would start scaling much earlier >> > > (for width 10: at 2 instead of 4). >> > > This is not bad per se, but different... >> > > >> > >> > OK: >> > return (it * width + (it + width)/2)) / (it + width - 1) >> > >> > Now it's back at 4. ;-) >> >> Sure, but at this point the original conditional is probably more >> efficient. >> > > Don't make me use > return it * width / (it + width) + !!it; > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html return it * width / (it + width) + (it != 0) Perhaps? -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html