apodtele <apodtele@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Instead of conditionally scaling the stat graph for large changes,
> always scale it asymptotically: small changes shall appear without any
> distortions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Missing e-mail address on S-o-b line. If your mail From: line
does not say who you are, please add an extra From: line in the
body, like this:
From: Alexei Podtelezhnikov <apodtele@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] diff --stat: ...
Instead of ...
Signed-off-by: Alexei Podtelezhnikov <apodtele@xxxxxxxxx>
I am not sure if any non-linear scaling is worth pursuing.
Suppose your change set has three files modified:
A adds 20 lines, deletes 10 lines
B adds 10 lines, deletes 20 lines
C adds 30 lines, deletes 30 lines
When drawing into a specified width that leaves 20-column for
the graph part, what would we see? What would we see if the
graph part is 21-column wide? 59-column wide? 80-column wide?
For obvious reasons, the total length of A and B exceeds half of
C, which looks quite misleading.
A | ++++++++++++--------
B | ++++++++------------
C | +++++++++++++++---------------
We could align things in the middle, like this, though:
A | ++++++++++++--------
B | ++++++++------------
C | +++++++++++++++---------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html