Hi,
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, A Large Angry SCM wrote:
> Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks, I didn't know about that one. But my general point is
> > > still: we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of
> > > one is actually a superset of the other. As far as I can see,
> > > anyway. So the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to
> > > simply eliminate the less-featureful implementation.
> >
> > *cough* git sequencer *cough*
>
> *cough* not in my ${PATH} *cough*
*cough* because that GSoC project failed in all but writing? *cough*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html