Heya, On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 15:31, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks, I didn't know about that one. But my general point is still: > we seem to have two implementations when the functionality of one is > actually a superset of the other. As far as I can see, anyway. So > the obvious way to reduce the duplicated code is to simply eliminate > the less-featureful implementation. *cough* git sequencer *cough* -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html