"J.H." <warthog9@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Thanks; all sounded a reasonable response to the review. Are you >> re-rolling the series anytime soon (I am asking because then I'd rather >> not to queue this round especially because I didn't see 5/6). > > I'll probably have some changes up and about tomorrow, and it's a > little troubling that 5/6 didn't come through for you > > 6 at least made it to marc.info: > http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126048884825985&w=2 Sorry; I meant to say "[PATCH 5/6]", not "5 and 6 didn't come". > and 5 seems to have been eaten by a grue somewhere. It was a *big* > patch mainly because all the caching flips over in a single go. If > you want I can privately bounce 5 & 6 to you so you have a complete > tree right now? Thanks, but not interested, in the sense that it wouldn't make much sense to me to have a version tonight that is known to go stale within a few days. I only pick up and queue patches to 'pu' to save me from later trouble of finding them from the mailing list backlog, and not to actively review and engage in the discussion to polish them right now. We are already deep in pre-release freeze and my attention is not currently on anything that won't go in to the upcoming release. I want to have a solid 1.6.6 before the holidays as a present to all ;-). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html