Re: [PATCH 1/6] GITWEB - Load Checking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
"J.H." <warthog9@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

It was intended to be the most minimal possible, mainly get in, get
out. Also not sure the die_error existed in gitweb when this was
originally written.  Probably worth switching to it now since it's
there either way, and I don't think using it would add enough overhead
to matter.

Thanks; all sounded a reasonable response to the review.  Are you
re-rolling the series anytime soon (I am asking because then I'd rather
not to queue this round especially because I didn't see 5/6).

I'll probably have some changes up and about tomorrow, and it's a little troubling that 5/6 didn't come through for you

6 at least made it to marc.info: http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126048884825985&w=2

and 5 seems to have been eaten by a grue somewhere. It was a *big* patch mainly because all the caching flips over in a single go. If you want I can privately bounce 5 & 6 to you so you have a complete tree right now?

- John 'Warthog9' Hawley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]