J.H. wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
"J.H." <warthog9@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
It was intended to be the most minimal possible, mainly get in, get
out. Also not sure the die_error existed in gitweb when this was
originally written. Probably worth switching to it now since it's
there either way, and I don't think using it would add enough overhead
to matter.
Thanks; all sounded a reasonable response to the review. Are you
re-rolling the series anytime soon (I am asking because then I'd rather
not to queue this round especially because I didn't see 5/6).
I'll probably have some changes up and about tomorrow, and it's a little
troubling that 5/6 didn't come through for you
6 at least made it to marc.info:
http://marc.info/?l=git&m=126048884825985&w=2
and 5 seems to have been eaten by a grue somewhere. It was a *big*
patch mainly because all the caching flips over in a single go. If you
want I can privately bounce 5 & 6 to you so you have a complete tree
right now?
Not to reply to myself but this might also be helpful:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/warthog9/gitweb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/gitweb-ml-v2
- John 'Warthog9' Hawley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html