Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> 
> > On 4/26/09, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > The deciding feature (well, one of deciding features) was the fact
> > > that Mercurial has better HTTP support... I guess (it was not obvious
> > > from the analysis, but it was hinted at) that Mercurial uses its
> > > custom protocol over HTTP, as opposed to "dumb" HTTP protocol support
> > > in Git.
> > >
> > > Perhaps it is time to restart work on _"smart" HTTP protocol_?
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > wasn't Shawn working on it?
> 
> GIVE HIM A BREAK!

Sorry.  While it reflects exactly what I felt reading your mail, I should 
have phrased it like this:

	Don't ask what Shawn can do for you.  Ask what you can do for 
	Shawn.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]