Re: Google Code: Support for Mercurial and Analysis of Git and Mercurial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin <at> gmx.de> writes:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> > 
> > > On 4/26/09, Jakub Narebski <jnareb <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Perhaps it is time to restart work on _"smart" HTTP protocol_?
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > wasn't Shawn working on it?
> > 
> > GIVE HIM A BREAK!
> 
> Sorry.  While it reflects exactly what I felt reading your mail, I should 
> have phrased it like this:
> 
> 	Don't ask what Shawn can do for you.  Ask what you can do for 
> 	Shawn.

It's something I raised a while ago with the eclipse.egit discussion; I'm happy
to step forward and see  what I can do to improve the HTTP access, since I 
think that's critical for adoption in organizations  who, through no fault of 
the end user, are either not directly connected to the internet or have to go 
via HTTP proxies due to firewall limitations.

Alex





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]