On 4/26/09, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > >> On 4/26/09, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> > The deciding feature (well, one of deciding features) was the fact >> > that Mercurial has better HTTP support... I guess (it was not obvious >> > from the analysis, but it was hinted at) that Mercurial uses its >> > custom protocol over HTTP, as opposed to "dumb" HTTP protocol support >> > in Git. >> > >> > Perhaps it is time to restart work on _"smart" HTTP protocol_? >> > >> >> >> wasn't Shawn working on it? > > GIVE HIM A BREAK! it was just a question. > Isn't Shawn doing enough for Git? No need to offload the stuff on him > _that you could very well tackle yourself_. shawn is a stellar developer and with my message i didn't want to imply that he should do more than what is already doing. It was just a question to better understand the issue. ciao. -- Paolo http://paolo.ciarrocchi.googlepages.com/ http://mypage.vodafone.it/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html