Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: > I personally am not interested in making this configurable at > all. The hashcmp() change on the other hand to abstract out 20 > was a good preparation, if we ever want to switch to longer > hashes we would know where to look. What about all of those memcpy(a, b, 20)'s? :-) I can see us wanting to support say SHA-128 or SHA-256 in a few years. Especially as processors get faster and better attacks are developed against SHA-1 such that its no longer really the best trade-off hash function available. -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html