Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 01:50:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> I can see the point of configurable hashes, but it would be for a >> stronger hash than sha1, not for a (much) weaker one. > > Why any configuration option at all? What in practice does it really > buy? I personally am not interested in making this configurable at all. The hashcmp() change on the other hand to abstract out 20 was a good preparation, if we ever want to switch to longer hashes we would know where to look. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html