Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:26:59PM CEST, I got a letter
where Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> said that...
> So I have to ask... what are the expected benefits of the move?

I've been meaning to do something like this for some time already; my
itch have been the builtins. The tree size _is_ getting out of hand and
a little more categorization of the sources would certainly help.
Although I'd take a different approach:

	libgit/
	builtin/
	standalone/
	scripts/

> In any case, use /interop instead. /scm in the tree of an SCM could be
> anything ;-)

I agree on this point.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]