Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:

> Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 11:26:59PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> said that...
> > So I have to ask... what are the expected benefits of the move?
> 
> I've been meaning to do something like this for some time already; my
> itch have been the builtins. The tree size _is_ getting out of hand and
> a little more categorization of the sources would certainly help.

Funny. I thought the builtin-* prefix, and the *.sh and *.perl extensions 
were there for the sake of categorization.

And I disagree on the "out of hand" thing.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]