Re: [RFC] just an (stupid) idea when creating a new branch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 10 Jul 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:

>   Hi,
> 
> Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 04:33:53PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> said that...
> > On Sun, 9 Jul 2006, Marco Costalba wrote:
> > 
> > > It is possible to add a message (and more) to a tag creating a tag
> > > object. FWIK this is not allowed for the other refs.
> > > 
> > > Why there is this (artifical?) difference between tags and the other
> > > kind of refs?
> > 
> > The tag message is nothing else than a commit message.
> 
>   huh?
> 
>   The tag message is a message in the "freeform" part of the tag object,
> but disregarding the format similiraties, it has really nothing to do
> with a commit message. (Also, commit messages don't tend to be commonly
> PGP signed. ;-)

Marco was talking about an "artificial difference", which means technical 
issues. From a technical viewpoint, the tag message is _exactly_ the same 
as a commit message.

Hth,
Dscho

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]