On 7/8/06, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
moreau francis wrote: > Hi GIT folks. > > I'm a complete newbie on git development so excuse me if > this idea is completely stupid. > > Would it be possible to let the user stick a short explanation > on what a branch is supposed to implement during its creation. It would be possible when/if branch and remotes config would migrate to .git/config. Currently too many I think relies on refs/heads being simple sha1 of "top" commit.
It is possible to add a message (and more) to a tag creating a tag object. FWIK this is not allowed for the other refs. Why there is this (artifical?) difference between tags and the other kind of refs? Marco - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html