Junio C Hamano wrote: > I see you are trying hard to think of a way to justify your > original prefix "--and" (or --FOO) implementation, but I simply > do not see much point in that. I doubt changing the default > operator from --or to --and is less confusing than changing the > precedence for the users, so you would hear the same "I > personally feel FOO should not even exist" objection from me. It just happens to make more sense to me and I don't see a reason not to add this. If no one else is interested in this I'll just stop arguing :) Here again an overview of the arguments if anyone is interested: - Less to type for common searches using only AND (or more ANDs than ORs). - Easy to implement (both with and without extended expressions). - AND/* is the normal implicit operator in other contexts than grep (math). - The high precedence operator (AND) should be implicit rather than the low precedence one (OR) (so this is only fulfilled when the option is used). - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html