Thomas Glanzmann <sithglan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Hello,
>
>> *AND* more than one pattern. (something I miss in normal grep)
>
> so do I.
So do I.
I am wondering if we would rather want to do something like
expression `find` command let's you build. In other words:
git grep --extended-expression '(' 'foo' -o 'bar' ')' -a 'frotz'
might be what we would eventually want. And I have this nagging
suspicion that if we allow to say something like this
git grep --and -e a -e b
right now, it would make it more cumbersome (read: backward
compatibility wart) to support both styles later.
I could be talked into
git grep -e a -a -e b
but that would already be building that expression engine, so...
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html