Matthias Lederhofer <matled@xxxxxxx> writes: > (Junio: please reply to this one, forgot the Cc in the first one :/) Huh? >> I personally feel FOO should not even exist. An option that >> covers the entire expression to make operator precedence in it >> sounds quite evil. >> >> I would say make --and bind tighter than --or and use parentheses as >> needed. > Ok, perhaps changing operator precedence is a bit much. What do you > think of that then: > ... I see you are trying hard to think of a way to justify your original prefix "--and" (or --FOO) implementation, but I simply do not see much point in that. I doubt changing the default operator from --or to --and is less confusing than changing the precedence for the users, so you would hear the same "I personally feel FOO should not even exist" objection from me. - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html