Re: bug?: stgit creates (unneccessary?) conflicts when pulling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/03/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Trying to implement this, I've just noticed that git-read-tree has a
> > --aggressive option which takes care of the file removals. Adding this
> > option lowered the pushing time in StGIT from ~2 min to under 2
> > seconds (merges between 2.6.14 and the latest kernel). There's
> > probably no need to deal with file removals in pg--merge-all anymore.
>
> Yup, it was originally done to improve the performance of
> resolve merge strategy, but I am glad somebody else has found
> use for it.

Actually, I asked for it about 6 months ago:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112677889118711&w=2

and I got the reply from you :-):

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git&m=112690084826630&w=2

Anyway, it's good we have it, it saved me some time with implementing
Shawn's merging algorithm.

--
Catalin
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]