Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> It however has a side effect -- uninteresting commits were never >> parsed here, but now they get parsed. I am not sure if there >> are correctness implications... > > Actually there is. If a merge with an uninteresting side branch > was the only thing that brought changes to paths we are > interested in, we do not want TREE_SAME logic to remove other > parents (i.e. the branches we are interested in) from the merge > commit. > > So we would need a combination of both, something like this? I can confirm that it "stg patches" works fine with this patch for git-rev-list. Thanks. -- Catalin - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html