Hi, On Fri, 10 Mar 2006, Fredrik Kuivinen wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:05:41PM +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote: > > On 3/6/06, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > - The deathmatch between annotate/blame (Ryan Anderson, Fredrik > > > Kuivinen, me cheerleading) > > > > Add fuel to the fire ;-) Can git-blame take cached git-rev-list > > output like annotate does with -S? > > > > Currently it cannot do that. How is that option used? The history is linearized, and the commits are ordered accordingly, then to be passed to git-annotate/-blame. > If you want to make annotate/blame faster for certain files you might as > well cache the output of annotate/blame instead of the git-rev-list > output, no? > > What am I missing? Two things: - the history is growing, and - it would be inefficient/error-prone to save the annotates for files Hth, Dscho - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html