Also, the old way of forcing a user to bypass a warning message every time he/she wants to save to the loaded format is (workflow-wise) much worse than just learning the "Export" hotkey imho. Also, it's clearly not a "flaw"; it's not broken, it's working as intended. If there were a vote, I'd vote to keep it the new way (and I process a very very high volume of product photos with GIMP). I reckon people are more likely to complain about a change in UI conventions than praise it... so here's one praising it. How many theoretical user votes is that worth? ;) My 2p. -C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Alexandre Prokoudine < alexandre.prokoudine@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 3:20 PM, A. da Mek wrote: > >>> How can we know how many of them there is, if they simply downgrade to > >>> 2.6 > >>> and do not bother to discuss it somewhere? > >> > >> > >> One of the first things I learned when I was in the marketing and PR > >> business is that unhappy customers do complain. A lot. > > > > > > A producer of a commercial product gets the complaints from the customers > > who paid for that product and are nor satisfied with it. He does not > know if > > there are any customers who were aware of the flaws of his product > already > > before they bought it, and so they simply decided to buy another product. > > This is simply not how it really works. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx > List membership: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
