29 февр. 2016 г. 11:35 пользователь "A. da Mek" написал: > For an average user, GIMP already has everything what > we need. But it does be a shame that many of us were > forced by this unfortunate change to revert to 2.6. Many of who? There is no indication whatsoever that the group of people who reverted to 2.6 is any large. > But the serious harm is that when we upgrade to 2.8 > and see that "save" does not behave in the expected, > logical and traditional way (as it ever behaved in > previous versions and as still behaves in other > applications (for example Inkscape)), Inkscape developers are considering the very same change: save only to SVG. > then we consider this version broken If I may just ask, could you please drop "we" and start talking in singular noun please? > But as I already said, this would be not much important if the users were properly informed about this contra-intuitive change. They were. Alex _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@xxxxxxxxx List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
